|
You guys are funny.... |
| Ashley from Atlanta says (26/Dec/2002): |
Some of you have no clue about cars and HP....a supra can make 750 HP and run 12 secs in the quarter, and a Camaro can make 300 HP and run 12 secs in the quarter...reason being...the camaro has 8 cylinders and the supra has 4 and twin turbos...so wouldnt you think 4 would have to work twice as hard? Of course, ive been doing this all my life....so its accurate....a good game...fun to play.....do some research before you bash something...just makes you look stupid :)
|
THE BEST RACING GAME OUT THERE |
| James from Somewere in the US says (26/Dec/2002): |
This game kicks major GT3 ass. the game is way more better than gt3 because it is more easyer than GT3's way of putting it. all togeather this game is the best racing sim out there
|
it sux ass |
| arthur from New Jersey says (26/Dec/2002): |
i don't like this gamefor one reason it doesn't have mitsubishi 3000gt vr4 and gt3 has some many more cars ot it. for example a 3000gt, graphics os gts are better and i can fell the speed in gt3 and sage gt 2002 the game play is really slow. one thing that i like about that game is the drag racing. but still who would make a game without 3000gt vr4 if u have any comments just email me at atakingarthur< remove me > at yahoo.com
|
This Game Owns.... |
| -=RLH=- Luda from Sydney says (22/Dec/2002): |
this game is probably the best game ive played ... the only reason i stoped playing it is coz i couldnt be bothered doin the "chronicle mode" .. all my cars do under 10 secs, i luv dat !! for all the beginers buy the "Peugeot 206" its exactly 13,000 n dont do it up just keep racing in the "Event races" un till u get about 30,000 den buy a nice car .. 300zx ... wrexy ... den do em up ...watch ull be owning all the otha cars... (coz ur still in the early stages...lol)
|
Better than GT3 |
| Kevin from Raleigh, USA says (21/Dec/2002): |
i have played gt3 and sega is a better. i havent played it that long but i can tell you gameplay is much better than gt3. But i would prefer the menus and event races to be more like gt3. A feature i like in sega gt is the traction control and the spin control, it really helps on turns, unless you are trying to drift.
|
Fucking sweet |
| elliot from Maidstone Kent says (21/Dec/2002): |
gt 2002 kicks ass it really does i love the way you can by any old worthless $hit like posters setes and other old junk and just chuck it at the back of your garage. The game is more simpler than gt3 which really beats gt3 the gameplay is smoother and it pretty much kicks arse and for any one whos stuck if you by the toyota levin at the beggining youve pretty much cracked it trust me!
|
Errrrrrrrrrrrrrr.................your American Dudes |
| Leon from UK, London says (20/Dec/2002): |
This game is awesome..........the fact you can select a Nissan Skyline GTR from the start of the game is a sure sign of some fun to be had. I got this game free with my X-Box here in the UK the price between the PS2 was £20 which in my opinion is a bargain. The game itself is a amazing improvement on the Dreamcast version as the handling has been tightened and all together has made this game very playable...........Sony! put that in your pipe and smoke it.
|
10 because it was free |
| james from somewhere, wa usa says (15/Dec/2002): |
this is a good game. for a free game, it kicks my ass all over the place. gran turismo is a sony game, so if yah wanna say that turismo is better than play your freakin sony you morons. AND. if you dont like load time play morrowind or timesplitters, then youll have a reason to bitch. It is too easy, but nobody mentioned being able to play against other people with the cars from your garage. thats the best part of the game. if u have no friends, then i can see why u wouldnt like this game. the best thing you could, if you have no friends is play with yourself; literally.
|
Ok, but kinda painstakingly boring |
| Mooose from Charleston, SC, USA says (14/Dec/2002): |
This game is an all-around good game, but it lacks a certain umph that most racing games have. The handling of the beginning cars could use alot of adjustments. When going around corners you are forced to almost stop your car completely. The race tracks are practically the same throughout the entire game. Your choices for cars are very limited in their top speeds. After getting the Ford car in the beginning of the game, the cars there after increase in top speed by about 1 mph. The graphics are fare, but I have seen better. The graphics of the cars are phenomenal where as the course's graphics don't own up to the rest of the graphics. I gane this game a rating of 6 out of ten because of the bad playability. It is a fun game until a while after you've played it.
|
come now, good, but not GT3 |
| The Ronnerman says (12/Dec/2002): |
Actually, "Justin", they DO force you to buy it. I got the Xbox bundle and have this game by default. It's NOT bad at all, very decent game, but anyone who says it's better than GT3 must have not ever played it, or hates it cause they don't like PS2. I challenge anyone to watch GT3 replays and THEN say this game is more realistic. It IS good, but GT3 is better for alot of reasons that are not arguable. For the box, this is the best racing sim, overall, Gran Turismo takes the mantle. Again, I'm not biased, I own all 3 consoles (game cube, ps2, xbox) and think xbox is a fantastic system, but please give credit where credit's due. GT3 is better.
Anyone tired of GT3 or doesn't have a PS2, pick up Sega GT 2002, it's worth the bean-age.
|
sega gt beats gran turismo |
| justin from lousisiana says (11/Dec/2002): |
this game is great it has all modifications you need graphics and racing style and who ever was complaning about the speed has a problem its loading time is a minumum compared to most games and from what i remember gt3 didnt load as fast as segagt .the cars look like they go the same speed as if you where watching it on t.v. its not the segas falt yall are stuck on high paced games like need for speed the game was made for realism not stupid crap . the only problem with this game is the lack of cars witch is made up with the use of quality cars not quantity.
sega has made many high performance games than you give them credit for .i dont see any one in here makin a big budget game that everyone want so why are you complaing about a game they dont force you too buy.
|
so many sega haters here got to hell |
| sony sux from Redding CA says (10/Dec/2002): |
All you do is compare it to Sonys gran turismo because you hate Sega. Sega GT 2002 is just as good as Sega GT on Dreamcast but more detailed graphics of course. If you do not like a challenging role playing style racing game then go back to your little gaystations ok and play that boring easy game gran turismo.
|
better than ever |
| josh from north carolina says (9/Dec/2002): |
sega gt 2002 is so much better than gran turismo, the game gets you the gamer into the game itself. there are just better options and more things you can do, i love the fact that they have old muscle cars on the game.
|
Brolly bomber |
| Brolly from Lakville, Mn, USA says (9/Dec/2002): |
Its a great game and all but it fails in coprasion to others if it only add better game play and a few more cars it be alot better the upgradable part was a nice touch and if they added A few more courses wouldn't hurt any.
|
excellent for 999 days |
| A gamer from tulsa says (5/Dec/2002): |
Great game. When did we start reviewing the reviews? Gran Turismo is grand turismo If you play it and don't spell it. There seems to be a 999 day glitch that allows no more track rotations or advancing of days. Unless my copy is bad, It would probably be best to stop saving as the day approaches. Great game for 999 days
|
it's ok |
| Chad from Ankeny says (4/Dec/2002): |
I thought GT 2002 was to easy I had the entire game completed and beat in about 8 hours total. All the load time is a pain in the ass imo, but graphics were good as was realizim. All I did was save my money, bought the Ford GT concept, modified the crap out of it and won every race on the first try! I would have liked it to be a little harder.
|
Move Over Grand Turismo |
| Chris Harley from Salt Lake City, Utah, U.S.A. says (3/Dec/2002): |
This game is the best race game I've played since the Need 4 Speeds. The graphics are smooth, more relistic looking cars, harder license tests better tracks more races. Sega GT 2002 is X-BOX's answer to Grand Turismo ever since I bought this game when I play it, I just can't settle for second place. I have a killer civic that beats almost every car. Grand Turismo MOVE OVER.
|
Pretty Good.. |
| "Jahovah"Juice Steve from Paris says (2/Dec/2002): |
Stop wining about spelling! For being free with the system it's pretty fun. If you like Gran Tourismo, but have an xbox, get this game for sure. I don't like dealing with the GAY "KUDOS" in Gotham. I like the fact that I can take stock cars and spend money on them as I go. Not test myself day in and day out to get different cars. I'll get there when I have the power.
|
Sega GT 2002 |
| Rocket X from Forest, MS, USA says (30/Nov/2002): |
This game is awesome. The graphics are so great, you practically drool looking at the cars. Some of you noodle-$#< remove me > at !es may say, "Oh, but Need for Speed: Hot Pursuit is sooo fun." Well, what makes this game far more supior to all the other loser racing games is the dash of role playing that Sega through in there. It makes you have to strive to become the best racer, not drive around like some circus clown on acid.
|
What about some education? |
| Guilio from Melbourne, Australia says (28/Nov/2002): |
I only have one comment, and it is not related to the game. I noticed while reading your reviews, its full of people who dont know how to write. I'm not talking about spelling errors, they can be expected. But for christ sake, there instead of their? It becomes evident that the "Gran" part of you are passing a little to much time playing and not enough time reading or somthing. GT2002 was pretty good, GT3 is better.
|
|
